Title: Supervillain: The Concise Guide

Author: Ras Ashcroft

Publisher: Independent

Pages: 90

Lending: Enabled

 

If you’re interested in Supervillains, this might be a book for you. Written in a non-fiction style, this satire is an interesting methodology on how to go from rags to riches… as a villain.

Ashcroft admits, right at the opening, that this is a parody of self-help guides on Finance. It fits this category, making very obvious jabs at how-to guides and self-help books.

In general, the book was well written, handling the line between fiction, non-fiction, and satire with adept ease. While some reviewers found this book hilarious, I found it to be subtle. Almost too subtle. The first 40 pages or so I found genuinely interesting, particularly in terms of the creativity in which Ashcroft builds a fictional supervillain empire. After that, however, it delves deeper into the expected cliches and rehashes what most people already know about being the ideal evil overlord.

In short, it went to the far-fetched and unbelievable at around the same time the book looks toward space as a viable method of taking over Earth.

The approach for this book I cannot fault. It does a good job of mocking many of the self-help books (on finance) that I’ve browsed out of curiosity. However, I do think that it stayed a little too much on the side of safety, using practical methods to become a villain without delving too dangerously into ‘evil’, such as it were. (The obvious fantasy of domination towards the end of the book excluded.)

To boil this book down a bit, ‘Common Sense Prevails’ is the golden rule. If it breaks the law, avoid it or cover your tracks and work in cash only.

I’d talk about characters and themes, but this book doesn’t really have anything of that sort. It is a down-to-earth guide on a method to become a supervillain. Would it work? Honestly, I don’t think so. I wish this book had more hard humor, cracks at heroes and villains, and otherwise not take itself too seriously. While it is obviously satire, I don’t think it was edgy enough or funny enough. It was just too close of a parody without that edge that I normally love in parodies.

There wasn’t nearly enough of the sharks with lasers, acid pits, spike traps, and maintaining a fortress of doom that I was really, really hoping for. Even if it was a step-by-step guide on why not to do these things as a viable supervillain. Ashcroft covered a little bit of it, but not nearly enough to satisfy my thirst for that sort of thing.

Yes, I was disappointed in the fact that there wasn’t a single guide on building a doomsday device of awesomeness or a torture mechanism just for superheroes. The solutions Ashcroft presented were just too based on reality and too reasonable.

I’m being completely unreasonable about this point, but being an evil overlord or super villain should be fun.

That said, I think it is worth the amusement value at the price of $0.99, especially if you’re into that sort of thing. Just don’t go in expecting to get stitches in your side from laughing. I did laugh a little a few times, but I was a little disappointed that I wasn’t as amused as I was hoping to be based off of the general description of the book, which poses a lot of ‘Would you like…’ questions that left me hopeful there’d be humor in the guide itself.

That said, for the price, it isn’t a bad read. It is pretty close to what I’d consider professionally publishable quality, which puts it above a great many of the independent books I’ve been exposed to. That said, I wouldn’t pay more than $0.99 for this book, as I think it does need more edgy humor to it and a harder edge to fit the them. I certainly wouldn’t purchase it if I was in a book store based off of the cover alone, which didn’t appeal to me at all.

If I had to give this book a star rating out of 5*, I’d give it a solid 3*. There were good points about it, and I didn’t feel like I wasted the 2 hours or so it took me to read through the book.

 

Is there a perception that book reviewers treat Self-Published books differently than Traditionally published ones?

I’m not sure where this train of thought came from, but it hit me dead-center as I was writing procrastinating on finishing a scene in my latest WIP that has been very fun and amazing challenging to write.

I’ve read more self-published/indie books than I’ve reviewed. The ones I’ve acquired on my own I haven’t reviewed for several reasons, but some of those reasons include not feeling the book was written professionally, feeling that the book was still in a rough-draft state, and generally disliking the book.

After some considerations, I realized I hadn’t reviewed some of these books because I had this mindset where if I couldn’t say nice things, I shouldn’t say anything at all.

Huh.

I don’t have the mentality about Traditionally published books. Why? I view these authors as professionals. Professionals can handle whatever opinions I might have about their book.

If I buy a traditionally published, large-scale publishing house book, all bets are off. If I don’t like it, you better believe I’ll rip that book apart. The simple truth is, there aren’t a lot of traditionally-published books I strongly dislike. There are some, but most I acquired years ago and never went bestseller. (For a reason, I assure you…)

But, when presented with books that haven’t been professionally handled or produced, I clam up. This usually means self-published. I shouldn’t do this.

Ah, time to make a quick distinction. Self-published books, where the author did all of the work, tend to be the least professionally produced as a general rule. (This isn’t always the case, and I’m stereotyping, but of the ones I got a hold of, this was the case.)

Independent publishers took more care with the general presentation of the book, but I have also seen books produced by them that had formatting problems for the kindle.

Moving back on subject.

Should self-published books get special treatment and blinders if they aren’t well written?

I want to say no, but the reality is, I have been wearing these blinders and walking around them like they’re made of glass. No one likes a piece of glass in the foot.

I think the problem is two fold.

First, I think the community and the fans are partially to blame. There are a few out there who will do anything to defend a book just because it self-published, indie published, or published by a small publishing house. I’ve experienced this first hand. (I will get around to reviewing more, but I have been working on critiquing other writers, working on my novel, and freelance writing. I have a novella and a pair of novels to read and review for my birthday!!)

I don’t like getting my tail-feathers burnt. It tends to be hurtful even though the point of a book review is to be honest about all elements of a book.

Second, I think is the general mentality that self-published and co. books aren’t to the same quality level as traditionally published ones.

It somehow makes me think of punching babies or doing something equivalently evil when treating these books the same as traditionally published ones.

Ouch. I can smell charred Rebecca already.

I want to hear from you what your opinions are. I do not mean to insult the competent, professional, and hard-working self/indie writers who do not fit this stereotype. This isn’t what this post is about.

It is about whether or not book reviews should treat these two types of published works differently.

For me, I think the answer is no, they should not be treated differently. The reality, however, is yes, they are.

What do you think?

 

Originally Posted on December 6, 2011.
Book cover - David Summers - Owl DanceBook Title: Owl Dance
Author: David Lee Summers
Paperback: 270 pages
Publisher: Flying Pen Press LLC
Release Date: September 14, 2011
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0979588936
ISBN-13: 978-0979588938

When I first heard about Owl Dance by David Lee Summers, I was intrigued by the concept of the novel. When given the chance to read it, I jumped at the opportunity. While the book wasn’t quite what I was expecting, I wasn’t disappointed. I have a history of being worried about titles that aren’t backed by major publishing houses. Flying Pen Press is a small, but the quality of this book did not seem harmed by that fact.

It didn’t take long to determine that this book would be an interesting read. The story opens with the meeting of Ramon Morales and Fatemeh. Morales is a Sheriff in a town named Socorro in New Mexico. This intrepid pair starts off in what looks to be a normal, western setting. A chain of unfortunate events and a witch trial put these two characters on the run.

Summers takes the opportunity to show us a bit of this alternate western United States through the eyes of these two characters as they travel across the states.

It doesn’t take long for the science fiction and steampunk elements to be revealed. However, if you’re looking for hard science fiction, look away now. This definitely falls as more of a steampunk, where the imagination is left to explain most of the sciences in the book. You won’t find many references to science at all in the opening of the book. Once it shows up, however, it adds a lot of interesting layers to this novel.

From pirates in submarines to robot wolves, Owl Dance provides as varied a cast of characters as any science fiction fan could desire. Aliens and Russians play into the mix, adding a level of complexity that many science fiction fans should enjoy.

I think this book will be enjoyed by those who enjoy moderate science fiction. It has the drier style I associate with harder science fiction, but the sciences presented are easy to handle without any second thoughts on it. The steampunk and science elements are secondary to story and character, but still play a significant role in the overall book.

Plot: 3.5 out of 5 *

The plot starts out as a strong western, but as more characters are introduced and the story takes a more steampunk turn, there are scenes that feel a little disjointed in the general flow of the book. This is made up by far by the interesting characters and general intrigue of the book.

Characters: 4 out of 5 *

The strongest part of this book are the characters. The romance between Fatemeh and Ramon is blatantly obvious but enjoyable nevertheless. In Gorloff and Legion, there is intrigue rampant that can change the world. The supporting characters, however, often seem flat as they often rely on stereotypes to come to life.

The Sciences: 3.5 out of 5 *

If I had to pick a flaw for this book, the lower science levels would be it. There is barely enough to satisfy the science fiction fan within me, especially earlier in the novel.

Note: The heart of my complaint isn’t the quality of the sciences. It is the quantity. The score reflects this.

Overall: 4 out of 5 *

David Lee Summers’ writing style is matched well to western steampunk. his narrative allows for a strong story, a smooth flow of action, and sensible, realistic characters. There are times where the book feels a little slow and that there was a lessening of tension where I felt that it could have been sustained for longer. Despite this, it was an enjoyable read.

Suggested Reading: I would recommend this book for adult audiences. While this book is suitable for teenagers, I don’t feel that this would be able to hold their attention unless they are serious steampunk or western fans.

 

Originally posted on December 8, 2011.

This will be a long review, for which I am not at all sorry. The existence of this post is a little bit of an accomplishment for me. In the search of authors to interview, I was introduced to Misha Angrist by his publicist. This was exciting for me, because it put me in touch with an interesting author and person. It was an experience I thoroughly enjoyed. At the same time I was discussing interviewing Misha, I was invited to review the book.

Much to my delight — and surprise — I got an actual copy for review. I’ve owned ARCs before, but never one that was sent to me, for me, for the purpose of reading critically. At least, not in actual, physical form.

I was delighted when it arrived, although it was a little worse for wear due to the rain. Fortunately, the book wasn’t damaged, although the packaging had seen its last days. It held on just long enough to get inside before it lost its ability to hold the book inside of it anymore. It did its job admirably!

Here is some information about the book before I start talking about it.

Paperback: 352 pages
Publisher: Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (November 8, 2011)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0062074237
ISBN-13: 978-0062074232
Product Dimensions: 7.8 x 5.2 x 0.9 inches

 

This is the second print run of the book, with a new cover design. The original printing was in hardback.
This edition of the book has a modified introduction. I have not read the introduction of the original version, so I cannot tell you what the differences in these versions are.

After I got the book inside, I took it to my desk and sat down. Just like a kid in a candy store, I opened the book. I meant to just take a little peek, really.

I’m not sure how much time I lost due to this ‘peek’, but by the time I looked back up, I had read enough pages of the book to know I had misplaced time somewhere. I am not someone who goes out and reads a lot of science-related books. I was never good at math, and my level of science is limited to ‘don’t dump water over flaming oil’. If knowledge of science was a precursor for life, I would have been kicked off of the island long ago.

While I was waiting for this book to arrive, there were questions milling about in my brain — distracting, worrisome questions. Would I be smart enough for this book? Would I be able to understand what was going on? How much research would I need to do for this to make sense to me? Genes and genomes are big, big things. They are heavy science. They’re the stuff that people with doctorates talk about in shadowy corners where the plebeians can’t hear what is going on. And make no mistake, I’m just another plebeian of society, for all I like reading a good science fiction.

Perhaps this is the reason — this lack of knowledge, ignorance if you will — that when I opened this book, I didn’t get anything remotely what I expected from it. In fact, it starts off rather normal. It starts with the year that Misha was born.

I had expected some science that I would inevitably have to research just to understand what was going on.

Misha writes of the kind of person he is, and a little about the circumstances that brought this book to life. And by life, I do mean life. If you were to judge the book by the very first page, you would not believe Misha anymore than a simple, normal, average man. And I mean that in the best way possible. He is just another human being.

It is on page two that he begins talking about his mission, and the exposing of his genomes for the public eye. It begins, not a lecture on sciences, on DNA strands and proteins, but rather a story of a few amazing people who have ventured into gray territories to get a better understanding of humans and what separates a healthy human from one who suffers from a genetic disease.

I admit, I had to slow down as i read this book. It isn’t light reading material, but it is well-written, well-explained reading material that is understandable even by people like me who haven’t been in a science course for at least ten years. There were times I had to stop and reference the notes, or I had to refresh myself on some basic scientific principles, but many of the things that should have been confusing weren’t.

Like the stories of the people who’ve worked to make genomes accessible to the public, the story of the science of genomics, the history of the science, and the events that hampered the efforts are brought to light in a way that is easy to understand while being interesting to read.

But, best of all, it isn’t just a book about sciences. It is a book about people. Not all of the stories are happy. But, it shows just why this type of science is important, and served as food for thought for me. It also proved that there are really people behind the sciences, something that isn’t reflected in mass-group studies and most of the science-related news the public is exposed to.

Unlike fiction, I can’t really rate this book by characters or plot. The characters are real people. The plot is life. I will say I found it an interesting, well-written read. I can’t tell you if it stands up to other genomics books, because I haven’t read them. I don’t know how it will stand up against the scrutiny of science lovers and scientists.

Overall, I’m giving this book 4* — there were times where I was confused and had to do research to figure out just what was meant, and slips that are common knowledge for scientists and not so for the average person. The writing is stable and interesting, and Misha Angrist does a good job of bringing a healthy dose of humanity to his writing.

Recommendations: I would recommend this book to teenagers and adults. There is a certain level of science knowledge required, but it is (mostly) the stuff you learn in middle and high school. The only significant issue with this book I had was the high number of references found within it. For those who want to know what those references mean, it involves a great deal of flipping to the end of the book to find out just what is being referenced. It is a challenging read, but one I find well worth the effort. It provoked thought, as well as offered some hope that with access to more genomes available, more individuals will become interested in this form of science to help combat genetic diseases, as well as determine in advance if a youth is likely to develop certain diseases.

If you are interested in purchasing this title, you can do so here.

© 2012 On Writing Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha