Editing is one of the most time-intensive aspects of writing a novel. Some folks prefer to do it by their computers. I am someone who must work with hard copy on serious edits. I’ve tried it a lot of ways, and this is the only way I consistently produce higher quality edits.

Simply put, I see the pages and the words differently. It is easy to tell when a paragraph is too long and needs broken up. I can see the flow better. I can tell when I’ve omitted things. I can see where I repeated myself. But, when your manuscript stack is almost as tall as a coke can, it can be very, very daunting approaching the pile of papers.

The first photograph is of all of the supplies I require to start editing. I have the full, untouched manuscript. (You can see that to the lower left.) I have the stuff I’m actively working on. That is forefront in the lower part of the image. At the top, fanned out all neatly, is the stuff I’ve already edited.

 

This image shows what my desk actually looks like when I’m working on the edits. (I only keep out the scene I’m actively looking for.)

Finally, this image shows the carnage typical to a page of the manuscript.

My rough draft is not a completed piece of work. It is a foundation. This is where the magic happens for me. The more I have grown as a writer, the more time I spend on this phase. The more I _think_ about how things piece together.

After I do the carnage, I edit it _again_ as I copy the changes. A lot of the handwritten sentences are thoughts that I refine when I put them in the story. (Or try to, at any rate)

The materials I use include: Post-it notes, post-it tabs, post-it flags, my novel/series bible, a laser printer, and several dead trees worth of paper. (Fun fact: I end up drawing on the backs of the manuscript before they’re used as kindling for my fireplace. One manuscript is enough kindling for a _long_ time… and the ‘free’ sketch paper is definitely a boon.)

 

Greetings! It is my pleasure to present to you A. R. Silverberry, the author of Wyndano’s Cloak. He has kindly agreed to take a little time out of his schedule to talk to us about writing, his book, and a little on his experiences with publication.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before we begin, please tell us a little about yourself and your book!

 

I’ve worked as a licensed psychologist for over twenty years. The writing bug bit me good in 1998, and I haven’t let up. Wyndano’s Cloak is for ages ten and up, and for readers who love stories with secrets, riddles, mystery, and intrigue. Here’s the synopsis:

 

Jen has settled into a peaceful life when a terrifying event awakens old fears—of being homeless and alone, of a danger horrible enough to destroy her family and shatter her world forever.

She is certain that Naryfel, a shadowy figure from her past, has returned and is concentrating the full force of her hate on Jen’s family. But how will she strike? A knife in the dark? An attack from her legions? Or with the dark arts and twisted creatures she commands with sinister cunning.

Wyndano’s Cloak may be Jen’s only hope. If she can only trust that she has what it takes to use it . . .

 

You are an independent author. Can you tell us what influenced your decision to take this route versus traditional venues?

 

I had submitted the prequel to Wyndano’s Cloak, as well as several storybooks, to mainstream publishers. I haven’t given up on that route, and plan to seek an agent for my next novel. If it doesn’t go anywhere, I can always go indie with it. One of my editors hounded me for an entire year to send Wyndano’s Cloak to an agent. I just had a very strong feeling that I wanted to do this one myself. I wanted complete artistic control.

 

Now that you’ve taken this route, do you feel that your book has done well?

 

The book has exceeded my expectations. It’s won a bunch of awards, including the gold medal in the Benjamin Franklin Awards, arguably the pinnacle of indie book awards. It’s gotten rave reviews. But the real measure of success is the response from readers. I’ve watched a girl at a book signing hug the book in arms. An author on twitter wrote me that her nine-year-old granddaughter was inspired to write near day and night after finishing Wyndano’s Cloak. At the end of my life, I can say that I had an impact.

 

We could ‘What if’ ourselves into gray hair, but how do you think your book might have performed if you had attempted traditional publication?

 

Traditional publishers have access to well-worn and well-greased pathways for distribution, promotion, and sales. The book would have gotten reviewed in major journals, and that would have resulted in library sales and wider distribution in brick-and-mortar bookstores. Initial exposure would have been much bigger. On the other hand, physical bookstores have to bring in new inventory. Shelf space is limited. They don’t leave books on their shelves for very long, unless it’s a perennial seller. Traditional publishers have shrinking budgets for book promotion. Both the traditionally published author and the indie author must shoulder the lion’s share of promoting their books.

 

What sort of things do you do to market your book? What has given you the best results?

 

The hardback was released in 2010, and the ebook was published a little over a year later. This resulted in different kinds of marketing efforts. For the hardback, I focused   on getting reviews; placing the book in over two dozen regional, national, and international expos; and entering book award contests. I lined up live book signings, where, so far, I’ve gotten my best results. They’ve been tremendously gratifying. Nothing beats making a real connection with real people. For anyone curious as to how I do these events, please see my blog article, Art of the Meet and Greet.  With the e-edition, I’ll continue seeking reviews, and I’m planning a blog tour. The incredible thing about the internet is that book marketing can continue indefinitely. The number of potential customers is virtually unlimited

 

What inspired you to write Wyndano’s Cloak?

 

I had just finished the prequel. The two worlds and most of the characters were fleshed out, as well as the antagonist that the heroine, Jen, would face. A gripping image popped into my head for what Jen would need to do at the climax. As soon as I had the end, I had the beginning, and I completed an outline for the plot in two weeks. The first draft streamed out quickly.

 

I don’t like describing books as plot driven or character driven. A good book should be both. But, if you had to label your book as either or, what would you label it and why?

 

I agree with you, and I would add a third leg, which is a unifying theme. Without that, the whole story tips over and falls apart. The characters can’t just be any old characters, they have to spring organically from the theme. Same with the plot, otherwise, what happens in the book is only a series of events. I was in the grip of the story when I wrote the first draft, so that part of the process was fairly unconscious. After that, I worked very hard on unifying the theme with the characters and plot. What I hope readers will find is this: children will get drawn into the story; older readers will enjoy the interplay between the characters.

 

What influenced you to become a writer?

 

In the late 90’s, my wife and I started reading the Oz book to each other. They inspired me to give writing a whirl. That got reinforced in 2000 after my wife, who is an artist, asked me to write some picture book text so she could work on her illustration technique. Things snowballed from there.

 

What influenced you to write fantasy?

 

My personality. In all the early photos of me, I’m staring off in a daydream. I was constantly making up stories in my head. I had one that ran in a continuous series that I resumed each night before I fell asleep. This went on for years. The first book I ever saw was The Way of the Whirlwind. My parents bought it for me and my brother before we were born. The illustrations were so colorful and magical, and the story was about the Dream People, the Aborigines of Australia. Then there were fairy tales, which I read and reread even as a teenager, and of course, all things Tolkien. It’s interesting, though, that I don’t tend to read much fantasy literature now. I’m drawn more to suspense, mystery, and thrillers.

 

What sort of work do you do as a psychologist, and how do you feel that it influences your writing?

 

When I came up for air on the first draft of Wyndano’s Cloak, I decided to focus on sinking more deeply into the story’s central metaphor and theme. One thing that influenced that process is the psychotherapy I do with children and adolescents. I’ve listened to their fears and longings; the environment and economy are just a few of the unprecedented challenges facing children today. In response to these challenges, I wanted to write a story that helps them feel capable of facing our complex and sometimes frightening world. Wyndano’s Cloak delivers a message of encouragement for young people to believe in themselves and trust that the treasures they carry inside will see them through.

 

What is your favorite part about writing?

 

The creative flow of the first draft. Seeing connections between story elements arising in unexpected places. Connecting with readers, particularly children.

 

What is your least favorite part about writing?

 

The second draft. Decisions about what to cut and what to keep can be painful. You have to do what’s good for the story. Funny thing, those cut elements often show up in other stories, so I try not to fret over them.

 

Editing is a serious concern for independent and traditional authors. How do you approach editing your books?

 

The whole process was fairly smooth. I hired two outstanding editors. One was a content editor, who looked at clarity, continuity, inconsistencies, and did some light line-editing for grammar and flow. I had a nasty habit at the time of dangling participles, which thankfully has been cured! The second editor was a copy editor, who looked for typos, spelling, grammar, and word usage. These two jobs are distinct, and you’ll put your best foot forward if you use two different people. The more eyes on the manuscript, the better. When choosing an editor, I suggest that people get references, and look at samples of their work. Find out what training they’ve had to edit. My copy editor passed a rigorous test, and I’m convinced he has the entire Chicago Manual of Style memorized! Finally, have them edit a chapter of your manuscript. You’ll find out fast if you are compatible. It’s important that you find someone who understands your work and what you are trying to accomplish.

 

What are you working on now?

 

I’m working on the second draft of a novel, part survival tale, part spiritual journey. It started out as a simple idea, but I’ve found that I have a huge amount of research to do at every turn.

 

No interview is complete without something off subject and fun. You have been transported to a fantasy land. During this transportation, you have gender swapped to a female. Not just a female, but a princess. Cast into this role, what sort of princess would you be and why?

 

My heroine, Jenren of Aerdem. I don’t have children, but she’s everything I’d wish for if I had one. She’s smart, determined, persistent, and has a huge heart. She bristles at injustice. She’s loved by her people, and can be found more often dancing in a country tavern than in court. She won’t rest until every man, woman, and child in her kingdom is safe.

 

Politics ahead. Be warned. But, this is censorship I’m discussing — and as a writer, this is a major concern.

I swear, politics is something that rears its ugly head day to day for all I try to avoid it. I prefer my politics in a fantastical world where I can devil’s advocate between two, three, five, or ten different Kingdoms without anyone looking at me as though I’ve grown a third head and a sixth eye.

But then I think about SOPA and all of the hidden caveats, the consequences, and the ripples that will sweep through the world as we know it. How will SOPA chance our lives?

How will SOPA leave me as a writer who wants to be published? I write Fantasy. I include politics in my writing. I share photography of other’s, though I give the photographers the credit they rightfully deserve. SOPA, if you consider online piracy, at first glance might be something that appeals to those who have copyrights. I can understand that. I’d like to be protected from piracy and theft if I get my precious book published. After all, it is my baby! It will be my income.

Then I thought about it a little harder, looked at it a little closer, and realized I supported a few basic principles that SOPA directly countered.

Here are the list of things I support.

  • Sharing Books with Friends.
  • Borrowing Movies from a Buddy.
  • Catching up on a TV Episode I missed… that won’t be available anywhere for months.
  • Watching TV in a language I do not speak and has been translated so I could enjoy watching it too. (I will often buy series I really enjoy and find ways to support the creators, despite the distance and language barriers.)
  • Going to the Library.

The internet has made these things easier. I can see a video or recording a buddy would’ve done for me through the internet. I can read a borrowed book. Hell, I can download a movie I already own but am too lazy to dig out of the cabinet. I’ve paid the piper.

Sure, not everyone shares these morals — or wants to do these things. But, what will the next step be? Twitter could be shut down because a user posts a link to a video they don’t own. Goodbye, Twitter. Facebook? We will only wish it will exist in the same functionality it once did? The supporters of this bill claim it will not happen, but is this the truth?

Google+? Buh-bye. I feel a bit bad for the photographers who get their images shared around with links back to them. I’ve learned of a lot of fantastic photographers and beautiful images I otherwise would not have known about through others. SOPA might very well mark the end of this sort of sharing. On a technicality, fair-use only goes so far and any disgruntled employee working with SOPA in the government could shut it down.

How long will it be before ‘protecting the copyright’ becomes a method of ‘censoring the people’? That is what worries me. Especially as I am a writer. Especially as I write about people in fantasy worlds faced with oppression. As a person who will be greatly concerned about protecting my copyright (because each copy of a book old is what will put food on my table…), I find myself questioning just how this law will be applied.

I am going to watch and wait. I’m not going to take sides, because I do not fully understand the ramifications. I’m a little ashamed (more than a little) that the bill is written in such a way I feel I need a doctorate in law to understand it. But one thing is clear to me: It may be the beginning of something far bigger and may change how people interact on the internet.

I find this sad. What websites exist that I love today that may not exist anymore once this law is put into place?

Just something to think about.

 

I have been reading a lot of articles on how the digital era of books has changed the publishing landscape. I’ve even read a few articles from less-than-reputable sources, as well as some from reputable ones, that talk about this very subject. There are too many to list. But, here is the one that made me feel like I wanted to put my opinion out there.

I am not doing a study. This is my opinion on the matter, and my experience on books that have gone digital.

I have purchased a lot more books now that I have the option of buying digital books.

What? Blasphemy! I buy more books because they’re digital? What happened to the sweet, sweet, dusty smell of a used book — the fresh, crisp scent of ink and paper of a new one? What about the starving writer who needs the hard copies to sell?

I am an impulsive person. I buy something I want. Digital books let me buy books immediately. I actually was infuriated that a big 6 publisher did not have a digital copy of a book I really wanted available. I didn’t have time to go to the book store. (I still go to the book store, by the way. I still buy a certain number of books in hard copies. These are books by authors that are my true favorites, when I really want to curl up in front of the fire with a real book. I even have two copies of these books. One on my kindle, and one in paper or hardback.)

Yes, yes, I had to buy a kindle. Boo hoo, woe is me. The kindle is actually better on my eyes, my back, and my neck. Ever since I transitioned, I got far fewer headaches from reading. I got to enjoy the books more. I was one of those people who swore never to give up the real book.

I changed my mind when I realized I could read without developing a headache, and that I was still prone to brush off the ‘page’ when I ‘turned’ it in my kindle. I forgot I wasn’t reading a real book. Because I was! The words were as real as before. I just got to enjoy them even more.

Perhaps the nature of the game has changed. Perhaps the ways books reach me have changed. But the truth of the matter is, I still go to the bookstore to scope out books to read. I still enjoy libraries and places where I can touch and enjoy real books.

But I buy most of my books as digital acquisitions. So there is more competition as self-published authors fight for the same market place, but when I want a really good book, I go to a bookstore.

Why? Because I still feel the quality books are there. I’ve taken my kindle into the bookstore and have purchased books on the spot I have found in the bookstore. I have — in that same trip to the bookstore — purchased real copies of books because I wanted that specific book on my bookshelf.

There is room for everyone. Adaption is necessary.

Self-pity at the fact things change is optional. Me? I think there is still a lot to be said for traditional publication. I know it does now — and forever will — hold a place in my heart. Why?

Sometimes there is nothing as comforting as the rustle of pages when turned, the scent of the ink and the paper, and sometimes — just sometimes — the staining of a page from tears when an author does their job.

 

Previously, I posted something a little more general about writing blocks. Today, I’m going to take it a step further and discuss one facet of writing blocks — the plot hole. Plot holes are events, sequences, actions, or dialogues, that break the consistency or plot of writing. They can include trouble spots that break the flow of logic. They can also include the lack of information. They can include events that couldn’t possibly happen due to the personality or nature of the characters, or events that just simply can’t suspend disbelief.

You can read a lengthy post from Wikipedia (Because it is so the fount of accuracy) for those who really want to get into the nitty-gritty of what a plot hole can entail. There are many other sources on the plot hole, but cracked has a rather amusing one showing the plot hole in its native habit… AKA, in movies.

They are sneaky, and can be something as little as one, tiny sentence that railroads your writing into a sequence of events you don’t like or shouldn’t happen in the story you have envisioned. I have encountered a plot hole that has been so little as four words, but broke the logic so much that I had to go back and correct it before I felt it was ‘safe’ to move on. Sometimes, they span entire scenes and chapters. In the worst of cases, the entire book can be one glorious plot hole. (I’ve done this. No, you can’t read it. It stays on my Wall of Shame for me to admire in the years to come.)

Plot holes are often blamed for writer’s block. I’ve fallen victim to it, and I’ll likely fall victim to it again in the future. I can’t tell you how to identify your own plot holes. That is something every writer has to figure out for themselves. However, I will share a little bit of my process.

I have people other than me read the work before I edit it. Beta readers are great for helping me pick out errors in my writing. I have a few who get rough, raw draft that hasn’t even seen a spell checker. (These people know what they are getting into, and tend to have no care for that sort of error. They just want to read a story and ignore the things of that nature.) They catch things like inconsistencies and plot errors. Because I know someone else is looking at it, I change how I read my own writing. I start catching those errors, too. Sometimes, I’ll even have corrected the errors before they get back to me about it needing corrected.

This is where critiquing comes in so very useful. The more I look for plot holes in other’s writing, the easier it became for me to spot it in my own writing. As I’ve progressed over the years, I’ve been able to spot more and more inconsistencies in my drafts without the use of outside help. This doesn’t stop me from putting up rough, raw draft on critique sites, however. The feedback on plot elements I hadn’t considered is usually priceless, and it sometimes gives me a good insight on how to improve my general skills.

As I’ve gotten better at writing — and I am by no means a master of the pen — I have noticed that I have needed to rely less and less on critique sites and beta readings to catch plot holes and inconsistencies. It might even get to the point I will only rely on private betas. I suspect once I get an agent and go to a traditional publisher, I will end up doing this because of all of the stipulations of contracts and the like. It would be a nice problem to have.

This is my process of identifying and dealing with a plot hole. (No, I do not make a checklist for these things. It just kind of happens naturally for me. I had to think about what I do to come up with this little list.)

  • Identify the problem scene.
  • Identify the problem.
  • Check what problems were caused by the problem.
  • Fix the problem.
  • Ripple through the entire book and correct all elements that changed due to the resolution of the problem.

The last point is the most important one for me, and the one that takes up the most time. It is just like a pebble dropped in a puddle. One event can trigger so many ripples you may not have anticipated. If you have a plot hole early on, it can change the entire course of your novel. This can be extremely frustrating. I know I have rewritten an entire book based off of the presence of a plot hole (or three). It was good for the book to have to be rewritten, but it also gave me a lot more respect for the editing process.

So, how do I identify a problem scene? This is a hard question. Sometimes it is a logic instinct. (I don’t like the use of ‘gut’ instinct. ) A gut-based feeling doesn’t necessarily mean the right thing. If logic can refute the gut instinct, I try to go with the logic. The logic is where I have put serious thought and effort into the writing. A gut instinct, or knee-jerk reaction, is often little more than someone slapping your knee with a hammer to watch your foot jerk. Do you want your novel to be based on that sort of reaction?

I certainly don’t. Gut instinct worked when I was just learning to write, but I’m trusting more and more in my brain and my conscious logic as I write.

Not everyone will agree with this, but hey — that is ok. This is what works for me. Not what works for you.

But, sometimes, that gut-instinct is good for identifying a problem. If it strikes a nerve and makes my foot twitch, something is wrong. I won’t use that instinct to fix it, but it does let me use my logic at that point to make the corrections.

I doubt that makes any sense to anyone other than me, but that is OK too.

You need to pick a system that works for you. Writing is often like this. There are no hard and fast rules. But, if a plot hole exists in your writing, you should fix it. If not for you, but for the people who will read your story. A plot hole often comes hand-in-hand with confusion and uncertainty. If you have something that breaks physics but works in your world and you explain it, it isn’t a plot hole. It is world building.

A plot hole is a negative thing. If it is an intentional, explained, accepted, and clear element of your writing, it isn’t a plot hole. It is a plot mechanism. (Terry Pratchett’s Disc World is a perfect example of this. In any other world, most of the events would be plot holes. In his, they are devices and they work.)

When you do find a plot hole, crush it ruthlessly and with extreme prejudice, even if it means you have to put in a lot of work to repair the damage. After all, don’t you want to build your house on a strong foundation? Plot holes are like a crack or hole in what holds your house up. Just some food for thought.

© 2012 On Writing Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha