Originally posted on December 5, 2011.

Greetings,

Today, I am going to take a few moments to make a sharp left turn from what I normally discuss to bring up the subject of book covers.

I am an extremely visual person. Book covers play a large role in the books I’ll actually buy unless I’m already familiar with the writer or the writer came with high recommendations from someone I trust. Book covers are often the first impression.

Book Publishers are aware of this, and use it to their advantage. This is the cause of much discontent among some authors, who have this grand vision for their book, but get a cover they didn’t expect or dislike.

Indie and Self-Published authors have the luxury of creating their own covers to suit their needs. However, I’ve found that these covers often fall short. The truth is, I’m often drawn to Big 6 published books because of their covers. Something about them — perhaps the years of experience manipulating my wallet — draws me to them.

But sometimes, a self-published or Indie author’s cover really, really takes me by surprise. In a pleasant way.

I’d like to take a moment to introduce you to one of those covers. The book is called Pecayune, and it is written by someone I’ve known for several years. Instead of mashing together a book cover on his own, he hired an artist to do his cover to match his book.

This is the result.

PIcayune by John DeJordy

This cover is a lot of things. It tells a story all on its own. It reveals some of the charm I admired about the Redwall books.

Because this is my opinion, I am not going to showcase any covers that I feel are on the other end of the spectrum. This is personal opinion, and what may be my garbage may be another’s gold. If you want to see bad covers, though, Amazon is but a click away. They aren’t hard to find.

My point is very simple: If you are an indie or self-published author, your cover will make or break out. It costs money, but invest in a good artist. It may be what stands between success and failure.

 

For those curious, this is how my attention is typically grabbed:

  1. Author (If known and liked, I often won’t bother with steps 2-5)
  2. Cover
  3. Title
  4. Back Description
  5. Random flipping to middle of book and reading half of a page.

If I make it through this five stage process, the book gets totted around the bookstore. I will compare it to other books I see and pick the ones I like best. Cover has broken quite a few ties for me.

They say, ‘Don’t judge a book by its cover’.

I say, “I judge a book by its cover because this is an item in my house, taking up my living space, that I will look at, read, handle, and enjoy for years to come.”

When it comes to cover, I want my money’s worth… and I am willing to dish out extra for a book that has an extra special cover.

Just my two cents!

 

Originally Posted on December 6, 2011.
Book cover - David Summers - Owl DanceBook Title: Owl Dance
Author: David Lee Summers
Paperback: 270 pages
Publisher: Flying Pen Press LLC
Release Date: September 14, 2011
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0979588936
ISBN-13: 978-0979588938

When I first heard about Owl Dance by David Lee Summers, I was intrigued by the concept of the novel. When given the chance to read it, I jumped at the opportunity. While the book wasn’t quite what I was expecting, I wasn’t disappointed. I have a history of being worried about titles that aren’t backed by major publishing houses. Flying Pen Press is a small, but the quality of this book did not seem harmed by that fact.

It didn’t take long to determine that this book would be an interesting read. The story opens with the meeting of Ramon Morales and Fatemeh. Morales is a Sheriff in a town named Socorro in New Mexico. This intrepid pair starts off in what looks to be a normal, western setting. A chain of unfortunate events and a witch trial put these two characters on the run.

Summers takes the opportunity to show us a bit of this alternate western United States through the eyes of these two characters as they travel across the states.

It doesn’t take long for the science fiction and steampunk elements to be revealed. However, if you’re looking for hard science fiction, look away now. This definitely falls as more of a steampunk, where the imagination is left to explain most of the sciences in the book. You won’t find many references to science at all in the opening of the book. Once it shows up, however, it adds a lot of interesting layers to this novel.

From pirates in submarines to robot wolves, Owl Dance provides as varied a cast of characters as any science fiction fan could desire. Aliens and Russians play into the mix, adding a level of complexity that many science fiction fans should enjoy.

I think this book will be enjoyed by those who enjoy moderate science fiction. It has the drier style I associate with harder science fiction, but the sciences presented are easy to handle without any second thoughts on it. The steampunk and science elements are secondary to story and character, but still play a significant role in the overall book.

Plot: 3.5 out of 5 *

The plot starts out as a strong western, but as more characters are introduced and the story takes a more steampunk turn, there are scenes that feel a little disjointed in the general flow of the book. This is made up by far by the interesting characters and general intrigue of the book.

Characters: 4 out of 5 *

The strongest part of this book are the characters. The romance between Fatemeh and Ramon is blatantly obvious but enjoyable nevertheless. In Gorloff and Legion, there is intrigue rampant that can change the world. The supporting characters, however, often seem flat as they often rely on stereotypes to come to life.

The Sciences: 3.5 out of 5 *

If I had to pick a flaw for this book, the lower science levels would be it. There is barely enough to satisfy the science fiction fan within me, especially earlier in the novel.

Note: The heart of my complaint isn’t the quality of the sciences. It is the quantity. The score reflects this.

Overall: 4 out of 5 *

David Lee Summers’ writing style is matched well to western steampunk. his narrative allows for a strong story, a smooth flow of action, and sensible, realistic characters. There are times where the book feels a little slow and that there was a lessening of tension where I felt that it could have been sustained for longer. Despite this, it was an enjoyable read.

Suggested Reading: I would recommend this book for adult audiences. While this book is suitable for teenagers, I don’t feel that this would be able to hold their attention unless they are serious steampunk or western fans.

 

Originally posted on December 8, 2011.

While I’m making efforts to review new books, this is a book I just reread recently and felt would be an appropriate candidate for review. If you haven’t read Sherwood Smith, she might be better known as the woman who wrote about Magic Schools before Magic Schools were popular.

A different novel of hers, Wren to the Rescue, is the first book of that series. It is set on its own world, unlike Harry Potter, but it might be of interest to those who like that sort of story. I just thought I would mention it, since it is also on my kindle right along with The Trouble with Kings.

But, I digress. I own quite a few Sherwood Smith books, although I have some mixed feelings in general. I’ll explain during the review. But first, to the relevant information on the title:

 
    

Format: Kindle Edition
    File Size: 571 KB
    Print Length: 328 pages
    Publisher: Samhain Publishing, Ltd. (February 12, 2008)
    Sold by: Amazon Digital Services
    Language: English
    ASIN: B0015YEQKU
    Lending: Enabled

This book tells the story of Princess Flian. It starts off with our lead lady suffering from a bout of amnesia, and a Prince comes to her rescue. But it quickly becomes apparent that the prince is anything but a White Knight. Caught in a scheme that would result in her marriage to King James, it is through the effort of James’s brother that she is kidnapped rescued and taken to the mountains.

From there, the plot descends a bit into the absurd, with a series of kidnappings and rescues that make most fairy tales seem tame. If you enjoy kidnap and rescue plots, this book is so for you. I won’t expose the number of times the characters are kidnapped and rescued, but it is definitely among the most common plot mechanisms used. To be fair, there are other situations from which characters are rescued, but sometimes it made me wonder if a better title for this book might be, 101 Ways to Get in and Out of Trouble with Kings.

Don’t worry, though. There is plenty of court intrigue for those who like it. That said, this book targets a female audience and may induce fits of helpless giggling at the situations that occur. Sherwood Smith does a good job of bringing the court to life, so if you are interested in a light read that does deal with intrigue, you may want to look at this book.

The first time I read this book, which was probably five or six months ago, I will confess that the twist at the end was not much of a twist. You can identify pretty quick who Flian wants. You can also identify who Princess Jewel, James’s sister, also wants. If you want surprise in your romance, you won’t get it here. The fun of this book is in the blatant, free-spirited nature of the writing, the characters, and the romps through court and countryside.

The Writing – 3 out of 5 *

If I had to pick a flaw of this book, it would be in the writing itself. First, it is written in first person. This isn’t my favorite point of view. Sherwood Smith makes it work, and I was able to ignore my general dislike for it, but there you have it.

Second, I always felt there was a feel of the modern in the writing. It doesn’t feel so much of a whole new world with completely new contrivances, so much as a second Earth that happens to have magic, whole new kingdoms, and all of the things that go with Kingdoms that are near one another all vying for power.

The writing isn’t bad, but it isn’t stellar. It wasn’t the writing quality that caught my attention about this book, but rather the characters and the absurdity that left me giggling throughout. there were points I stopped, stared at the text, and went, “Are you kidding me?”

My last gripe is with the descriptions. Sherwood Smith will take the time to explain the material and fabric of dresses, but good luck getting a really solid mental image of the castle. I simply gave up hoping for significant descriptions and put all of the characters in the most fairy-tale castles i could think of. That idea worked well for this book, and I recommend doing this if you are going to give this book a read.

It isn’t all bad, however. The writing style does allow for the characters to make a strong stand through the novel. And make no mistake, it is the characters that carry this book, not the plot or the writing.

The Characters  - 4.5 out of 5 *

It is the characters that made this book really so enjoyable. You have Princess Flian, who acts just like I felt a Princess should — a little stuck up, but a real person with a love of music and a dislike of everyone and their cousin wanting her for her money and not for the rest of her. She is in the situation to wed for love and not power or wealth, and she knows it. She starts off weak and becomes strong, which is something I definitely appreciated reading through.

And Princess Flian isn’t alone. Princess Jewel is an excellent counterpoint to Flian, offering important bits of humor, friendship, and the necessary movements in plot that keep this book from going completely in circles. Jewel has a major fatal flaw, though. I wouldn’t quite call her born yesterday, but the general idea did pop to mind here and there as the book progressed.

The villains in this book are absolutely delicious. I loved them, or loved hating them. They’re people. Some of them definitely fit the saying of, ‘They are heroes of their own stories’. One of them is just a sleaze that I really, really enjoyed hating. The ‘villains’ aren’t always cookie cutter, and things arent always what it seems, which is something I liked a lot about this book.

The Plot – 2.5 out of 5 *

If you’re looking for a complex plot, look away. I don’t recommend this book in terms of plot. There are repeated mechanisms, obvious mechanisms, and a general lack of uniqueness to this book. All in all, it is a snicker’s bar read. But, the plot does serve its purpose. It gives the characters a place to stand while they romp through the book. But, if you don’t like repetition and a certain amount of irony, you may dislike the book based on the plot.

I could ‘What if’ all day long, but the truth of the matter is, I wouldn’t avoid this book just because the plot isn’t all that I hoped it could be. The characters more than make up for it, although I suspect if the plot had matched the characters, this would be a non-stop read. Or, if, perhaps, there had been one or two less rescues. It does lose its glitter after the first couple of times it happens, even if the characters being rescued change a little. In pursuit of honesty, it isn’t always the same character in need of rescue!

Overall - 4 out of 5 *

If Characters, Plot, and Writing were all that made up a book, I wouldn’t be able to rate it overall this high. But, the simple truth of the matter is, I enjoyed this book. It was a fun read. It was an escape from the norm, and it made me laugh. There were points I had to stop reading because I was laughing so hard. Both from the humor of the book and the absurdity of some of the parts of the book.

It also kept me up past my bed time the first and second time I read the book. This definitely counts for something, and the overall reflects this. I wouldn’t go so far as to give it a 5*, because there are so many things that didn’t meet up to my general expectations, but the truth of the matter is, this book is fun. Fun doesn’t need to be elegance in writing, gold and silver dishware, and a steaming cup of tea served in fine, gold-rimmed teacups. (I haven’t had my morning cup of anything hot yet this morning, can’t you tell?) I just wouldn’t go in expecting regal elegance, but rather humor, romance, a bit of cheese, and a good time in general.

Recommended For: This is a book I strongly recommend for women. Especially teenage women. I’m not really sure how most men would deal with the very, very feminine styling. But, if you enjoy Princesses, Princes, Court and Regalia, this book might be for you. If you want to escape and get a lot of giggling done in short order, this book may also be for you. This book is suitable for younger audiences. I would consider it a YA that happened to also appeal to adults. I also wouldn’t be alarmed if my five year old got a hold of this book. I’m not sure she would understand it, but there isn’t any content I didn’t view as not safe for kids. IE, there are no sex scenes and the violence isn’t that significant. (Please note: I don’t actually have a five year old, or any child for that matter, but if I did have one, I wouldn’t be ashamed of it lying on the floor where she might pick it up.)

If you’re a fan of the cheesy romance novel (I may fall into this category from time to time) you may also enjoy this book. There is enough romance elements tied in with the fantasy that it will likely appeal to both crowds. If you’re looking for high fantasy, this book likely won’t satisfy. Magic serves as a backdrop, and is very common. As such, people use magic and it is just a part of life. There is very little special about the presence of magic.

I would recommend this book to people who want to explore fantasy for the first time, as well. There are enough similarities to our world that it might be an easier read for those who aren’t used to high epic fantasy or general sword and sorcery. I would call this a fantasy light with lots of romance and leave it at that.

If you decide to read this book, I hope you enjoy it. I know I did! You can purchase the book from here.

 

Originally posted on December 8, 2011.

This will be a long review, for which I am not at all sorry. The existence of this post is a little bit of an accomplishment for me. In the search of authors to interview, I was introduced to Misha Angrist by his publicist. This was exciting for me, because it put me in touch with an interesting author and person. It was an experience I thoroughly enjoyed. At the same time I was discussing interviewing Misha, I was invited to review the book.

Much to my delight — and surprise — I got an actual copy for review. I’ve owned ARCs before, but never one that was sent to me, for me, for the purpose of reading critically. At least, not in actual, physical form.

I was delighted when it arrived, although it was a little worse for wear due to the rain. Fortunately, the book wasn’t damaged, although the packaging had seen its last days. It held on just long enough to get inside before it lost its ability to hold the book inside of it anymore. It did its job admirably!

Here is some information about the book before I start talking about it.

Paperback: 352 pages
Publisher: Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (November 8, 2011)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0062074237
ISBN-13: 978-0062074232
Product Dimensions: 7.8 x 5.2 x 0.9 inches

 

This is the second print run of the book, with a new cover design. The original printing was in hardback.
This edition of the book has a modified introduction. I have not read the introduction of the original version, so I cannot tell you what the differences in these versions are.

After I got the book inside, I took it to my desk and sat down. Just like a kid in a candy store, I opened the book. I meant to just take a little peek, really.

I’m not sure how much time I lost due to this ‘peek’, but by the time I looked back up, I had read enough pages of the book to know I had misplaced time somewhere. I am not someone who goes out and reads a lot of science-related books. I was never good at math, and my level of science is limited to ‘don’t dump water over flaming oil’. If knowledge of science was a precursor for life, I would have been kicked off of the island long ago.

While I was waiting for this book to arrive, there were questions milling about in my brain — distracting, worrisome questions. Would I be smart enough for this book? Would I be able to understand what was going on? How much research would I need to do for this to make sense to me? Genes and genomes are big, big things. They are heavy science. They’re the stuff that people with doctorates talk about in shadowy corners where the plebeians can’t hear what is going on. And make no mistake, I’m just another plebeian of society, for all I like reading a good science fiction.

Perhaps this is the reason — this lack of knowledge, ignorance if you will — that when I opened this book, I didn’t get anything remotely what I expected from it. In fact, it starts off rather normal. It starts with the year that Misha was born.

I had expected some science that I would inevitably have to research just to understand what was going on.

Misha writes of the kind of person he is, and a little about the circumstances that brought this book to life. And by life, I do mean life. If you were to judge the book by the very first page, you would not believe Misha anymore than a simple, normal, average man. And I mean that in the best way possible. He is just another human being.

It is on page two that he begins talking about his mission, and the exposing of his genomes for the public eye. It begins, not a lecture on sciences, on DNA strands and proteins, but rather a story of a few amazing people who have ventured into gray territories to get a better understanding of humans and what separates a healthy human from one who suffers from a genetic disease.

I admit, I had to slow down as i read this book. It isn’t light reading material, but it is well-written, well-explained reading material that is understandable even by people like me who haven’t been in a science course for at least ten years. There were times I had to stop and reference the notes, or I had to refresh myself on some basic scientific principles, but many of the things that should have been confusing weren’t.

Like the stories of the people who’ve worked to make genomes accessible to the public, the story of the science of genomics, the history of the science, and the events that hampered the efforts are brought to light in a way that is easy to understand while being interesting to read.

But, best of all, it isn’t just a book about sciences. It is a book about people. Not all of the stories are happy. But, it shows just why this type of science is important, and served as food for thought for me. It also proved that there are really people behind the sciences, something that isn’t reflected in mass-group studies and most of the science-related news the public is exposed to.

Unlike fiction, I can’t really rate this book by characters or plot. The characters are real people. The plot is life. I will say I found it an interesting, well-written read. I can’t tell you if it stands up to other genomics books, because I haven’t read them. I don’t know how it will stand up against the scrutiny of science lovers and scientists.

Overall, I’m giving this book 4* — there were times where I was confused and had to do research to figure out just what was meant, and slips that are common knowledge for scientists and not so for the average person. The writing is stable and interesting, and Misha Angrist does a good job of bringing a healthy dose of humanity to his writing.

Recommendations: I would recommend this book to teenagers and adults. There is a certain level of science knowledge required, but it is (mostly) the stuff you learn in middle and high school. The only significant issue with this book I had was the high number of references found within it. For those who want to know what those references mean, it involves a great deal of flipping to the end of the book to find out just what is being referenced. It is a challenging read, but one I find well worth the effort. It provoked thought, as well as offered some hope that with access to more genomes available, more individuals will become interested in this form of science to help combat genetic diseases, as well as determine in advance if a youth is likely to develop certain diseases.

If you are interested in purchasing this title, you can do so here.

 

Originally posted on December 12, 2011

I have been able to get done a lot of reading lately, in part due to my husband’s sudden interest in reading before bed every night. This has been even romantic, one night, as we cuddled in front of the fireplace. I was sipping port, and he was sipping at a rather nice whiskey. Please never find and tell my husband that I think that brand of whiskey is actually nice.

As always, a little information about the book before I begin talking about it:

        Format: Kindle Edition
        File Size: 904 KB
        Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
        Publisher: Astraea Press (October 17, 2011)
        Sold by: Amazon Digital Services
        Language: English
        ASIN: B005WNXJRG
        Lending: Enabled

The book opens with us meeting Cheyenne, the heroine of the tale. She is presented as an ordinary girl with the problems of ordinary teenagers going to school. She isn’t much one for boys, and she isn’t much one for social games. One day at school, she meets a boy that catches her attention.

When she is invited to a party, she attends, and meets that boy all over again. We learn that his name is Denver, and he is the catalyst that propels Cheyenne into a world of magic, adventure, and the divine. At first, she starts hearing what plants have to say. Then she discovers that she is adopted, and that her real parents wanted to protect her. This leads her to a new home at a boarding school.

From there, the books turns toward the expected adjustment period of a girl who comes from a normal world and finds herself in a more magical one. She discovers that there may be more to myths than she ever could imagine.

Characters: 4 out of 5 *

The characters that J.F. Jenkins brings to life are interesting. They are a mixed bunch, all of different heritages and thoughts on how they want life to go on around them. The drama between the characters is the realistic social climbing of teenagers. It is definitely the characters that carry this book and make it an interesting read — albeit light — from beginning to end.

Most of the tension in this book is spawned from the relationships of the characters. However, this is as much a disadvantage as it is an advantage. Due to the strength of the characters, other elements of the book have gone a little to the wayside. The plot is character-oriented, and the tension levels are not as high as I would like. Due to the general flexibility and strengths of the characters, the tension that should have been associated with the events in the book are not nearly as strong as they could be.

That said, it is the interesting assortment of characters, and how realistic to teens they feel that make them an enjoyment to follow.

Plot: 2 out of 5*

For me, the weakest element of this book was the plot. There is no distinct, immediately recognizable villain, and while there is a threat to the character,the way that it is treated doesn’t feel very threatening to Cheyenne, who is happy to flaunt the rules in place that are meant to protect her. The villains — such as they are — are not as defined as they could be, and even the worst-case scenario doesn’t necessarily feel like it will destroy the world or her life if they should come to pass. Even the more evil of the characters presented are presented with good-sides, heroes of their own stories that are misunderstood rather than true villainous counterpoints to the strong heroine.

Cheyenne is presented in such a way where coping, adjusting, or even conquering the worst-case scenario is believable. That said, while weak, it did get the characters from the start to the finish of the book. In some ways, it feels more like a set-up to a book in terms of plot, which does in turn give me hope for the second book being more interesting in terms of the ramifications faced by all of the characters involved.

If I could ask for one thing from this book, at least in terms of plot, I would ask for higher stakes at the end so that the closure felt more complete. And a more villainous villain, so that all of the worry of the adults is more justified. As it is, it almost felt as if things returned to the starting state, allowing for the characters to pick back up where they left off.

Setting: 3.5 * out of 5 *

The setting was something I had a love-hate relationship with in this book. I loved the mix of magic and normality, the general setting of the school, and the tone that the book took. There were times where it felt like descriptions took too long in comparison with the rest of the book. There were some rather beautiful descriptions in this book which helped bring the setting to life, which I appreciated as I was reading. There were other times where I wanted less setting placement and wanted more story. But, the job got done, and J.F. Jenkins made good efforts to bring the environment Cheyenne must cope with to life.

The one flaw I did find with this story was that, while there are references to magic and magical beings, it almost felt like it was a magic school that didn’t actually teach magic. Some of the students know some forms of magic, but we don’t see the magic through Cheyenne’s eyes, except in small bursts here and there.

Overall, I am giving this book 3*. It was an entertaining read, and I enjoyed some of the situations that Cheyenne got herself into (and out of). I got the feeling that this book was just starting to bloom, and that the second book should be so much stronger for the presence of the first, but that a lot of the things presented are there so that if there is a second book (which it feels like there should be), it will be something well-worth reading. If I were presented with a copy of book 2, I would definitely give it a try. I am not sure I would spend a lot of money on a copy of book 2 — certainly not the amount I’d pay for a hardback — but I wouldn’t be ashamed of having this book — and future titles — on my book shelf.

P.S.: I would recommend this book to anyone who wants a light, relaxed read. Teens would have a good amount to relate to, and I feel it is more targeting a female audience, as there are a lot of female-centric issues covered during the book.

If you are interested in purchasing this book, you may do so here.

 

Originally posted on December 5, 2011.

Today is something special for my blog. I talk science fiction and fantasy often. But, despite the close-knit ties with world creation and sciences, I don’t often get to talk about actual science.

Book Cover
Here is a Human Being: At the Dawn of Personal Genomics

It is my pleasure to introduce to you Dr. Misha Angrist, the author of Here is a Human Being: At the Dawn of Personal Genomics. I read non-fiction often as a part of freelance writing. Research is necessary.

This has made me rather jaded to quite a bit of research material that once used to be very exciting. This book managed to catch my attention right from the start, and not only because of the subject matter.

While this book is much more fact than fiction, fact is what Science Fiction (and even Fantasy) is based off of. The question of ‘what if’ is a major part of speculative fiction, and without truth to back it, this genre of writing couldn’t even exist. Even the most far-fetched tales, after all, do include a glimmer of reality and truth.

Without further ado, on to the interview!

Misha, thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to answer these questions.  Can you please tell us a little about your book?

Thanks for having me, Rebecca! My book, Here is a Human Being: At the Dawn of Personal Genomics follows the rise of cheap DNA sequencing and its initial foray into research on human beings and its arrival in the marketplace. It asks what genomics is and why we should care: what can a person learn from her DNA sequence? It tells the stories of a number of people who have been involved in personal genomics from the ground up. It is a narrative nonfiction book that is part science, part journalism and part memoir.

I have heard that a lot of research scientists get into a specific branch due to personal events in their lives. Unfortunately, the rumor has it that these are tragedies. Is this true? What events in your life brought you to the point that you wanted to make a study of human genes and genomes, and volunteering yours for study?

Many years ago I trained as a genetic counselor. After that I did a PhD and a postdoc in genetics. For about eight years I studied a rare genetic disease of the intestinal tract called Hirschsprung disease. As fate would have it, my nephew was born with Hirschsprung disease in 2005. He is generally healthy but he has had multiple surgeries and he and his parents have been through a lot.

To be honest, my understanding of human genes and genomes is limited to ‘the instruction manual of living things’. Sciences aren’t pushed in schools as nearly as much as they should be. Can you give us a brief lesson on genes and genomes and why this area of study needs to be pursued by more scientists?

A genome is the complete DNA sequence of any organism. DNA is a code written in four letters: A, G, C and T. We speak of “the human genome” as a shorthand, but really, except for identical twins, every person’s genome is a little different from every other person’s. We get half of our 6 billion letters of DNA from our biological mother and half from our biological father. About 2% of our genome actually corresponds to genes–individual units of heredity–that code for proteins like collagen and hemoglobin. We don’t know what most of the rest of our DNA does. These are two of the great challenges: understanding what all that DNA does and understanding what all of the variation in our genome does.

Off of the top of your head, If you had to pick one scientifically accurate Science Fiction book relating to genes and genomes, which book would you pick? What is so accurate about this book? Do you feel that this book was ahead of its time?

That’s an excellent question…which I’m going to dodge. In literary fiction, I think Allegra Goodman’s Intuition really captures the life of a postdoc in a modern lab in a way that really hadn’t been told before. As far as more traditional science fiction goes, I think Jurassic Park is a fun thought experiment: what if we could clone dinosaurs? Scientifically there’s a lot of hand-waving (frog DNA etc), but it’s something that is still a plausible what-if question.

On the flip side of the coin, there are a lot of inaccurate Science Fiction novels relating to genes and genomes out there. What book do you feel is the worst offender, and why?

Gosh, I’d be hard-pressed to pick just one…Chromosome 6 is pretty ridiculous. And not to let Michael Crichton off the hook: Next is so over the top that you wonder if it shouldn’t have gone to straight to video. That said, I confess that I’m quite curious about Micro, which is the book Crichton was working on when he died and that was finished by Richard Preston, who, in my opinion, is a master.

We couldn’t talk about Science Fiction books and accuracy without repeating the process for movies. What one movie would you pick as the most scientifically accurate Science Fiction film?

My colleague David Goldstein and I show GATTACA to our nonmajors human genome class. There are a few liberties taken with the science, but again, it asks a question that is fair to ask: what if society were stratified based mainly on DNA? And the film asks it in a stylish and compelling way. The Boys from Brazil was ahead of its time as far as thinking about genetic determinism and environment. I would also put in a word for Ron Moore’s re-imagined Battlestar Galactica series, which grapples with what it means to be human and singlehandedly deconstructed so many of the reigning sci fi cliches.

Which film would win the prize for the worst offender?

Hoo boy. There are so many stinkers to choose from. Godsend comes to mind (it also raises the oft-asked question: what the hell happened to Robert De Niro?). Sphere with Dustin Hoffman babbling on incoherently is so bad that it’s almost good. And I suspect that Battlefield Earth didn’t win many converts to Scientology.

I have a little bit of a tradition of asking victims . . . er, volunteers a question to conclude an interview. Stuck on an empty island is overdone. You are trapped in an elevator and the emergency phone doesn’t work. You have one individual with you. This individual can be a super hero, an author, a mad scientist – anyone you want, dead or alive. Who would you want with you in the elevator and why? Would you pick someone to talk with, or would you escape? You’ve a world of possibilities!

I’m a bit claustrophobic so I’d probably pick someone with the skills to get me out. Houdini, perhaps? David Blaine? Probably the safest bet would be MacGyver.

Thank you very much for taking the time to answer these questions!

Thanks!

 

Originally posted on December 6, 2011.

Greetings!

In case you haven’t noticed, there has been a lot of interviews lately. I’m pleased to say that this isn’t the end of them. If you’re an author, agent, editor, or someone with know-how about the publishing world, and  you’d like to be a victim of one of these interviews, please feel free to give a shout out. You can send me a tweet (@rebeccablain) or find me on google+.

Now, for the interview. Today, I am pleased to introduce to you David Summers. David has written several books, edited a magazine for 17 years, and has also done editing work for anthologies.

Greetings, David!

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to answer these questions. Congratulations on your recently release of your book. Can you tell us a little about your book and the journey you took to get it from conception to print?

My latest novel is called OWL DANCE and it’s a wild west steampunk adventure. It tells the story of a healer from Persia named Fatemeh Karimi who tries to make a life for herself in the Southwest, but rapidly gets in trouble with one of the local mine owners. A sheriff named Ramon Morales helps her out and they both end up on the road, falling into one adventure after another. They meet mad scientists, pirates and ultimately they have to stop an invasion of the United States by Russian airships.

You can read a bit more about the novel at the publisher’s website.

The novel started out as a short story called “The Persian Witch” which ran in the anthology TRAILS: INTRIGUING STORIES OF THE WILD WEST which was published in 2006. In 2007, I wrote two more stories featuring Ramon and Fatemeh. During the course of those stories, Ramon and Fatemeh’s world took on more of a Wild West steampunk look. Then in 2009, David Rozansky of Flying Pen Press asked if I had a steampunk novel that I could pitch to him. I sent him the stories plus an outline that showed the story arc I had in mind. He gave me the green light and I proceeded to write the novel. He purchased it at the beginning of 2011.

This isn’t your first time working with Flying Pen Press. What made you choose this specific press for your books versus trying for a different press?

I edited two of the FULL-THROTTLE SPACE TALES anthologies for Flying Pen Press: SPACE PIRATES and SPACE HORRORS. I enjoyed working with David Rozansky on those collections and I liked the quality of the books themselves. Moreover, I’ve seen those books distributed in more bookstores than any of my other titles.

Of course, David Rozansky sparked OWL DANCE by asking for an outline, so as far as I was concerned, he had first right of refusal for the finished novel. Also, I knew he had hired a good editor, knowledgeable about the steampunk genre. All of those facts together prompted me to stick with Flying Pen through the whole publication process.

What process did you use to select your publisher? Can you tell us anything about the pitfalls and challenges that you encountered on your way to getting your books in print?

At the point that I wrote OWL DANCE, I had two established publishing companies that I had a really good working relationship with — one of them being Flying Pen Press. I like both companies about equally, but OWL DANCE was something quite different from what the other publisher had done. In particular, because David Rozansky had hired Matt Delman to edit steampunk titles, I thought Flying Pen had a particular passion for this up-and-coming genre that my other publisher didn’t necessarily share.

Because I already had two established publishers, I actually had a relatively easy time bringing OWL DANCE to print.

Earlier in my career, it was a different story. I had an agent who sold my novel THE PIRATES OF SUFIRO to a publisher in Canada. That publisher promptly went out of business and I had a book few people were interested in. I’ll tell a little more of that story in the next question, but in short I tried to resell the book and its sequel CHILDREN OF THE OLD STARS without much success. Finally, a friend of mine was hired as an art director for LBF Books. He encouraged me to submit the books there. They loved them and asked if I could complete the trilogy, which I did. The books have been in print with them ever since. LBF also went on to publish my novel VAMPIRES OF THE SCARLET ORDER.

Do you have an agent? If you do, what steps did you take to acquire him or her? If not, what made you choose not having an agent?

As I mentioned in the previous question, I had an agent. I was living in Tucson at the time, and this particular agent was scheduled to come to a local book festival. She was taking submissions of manuscripts to evaluate, so I sent THE PIRATES OF SUFIRO to her. In the meantime, I researched her and she appeared legitimate with a listing in Literary Market Place and a good client list. I was thrilled when she agreed to represent THE PIRATES OF SUFIRO.

Unfortunately, what I didn’t know was that she was involved in a scam to send authors to a vanity press. She ultimately went to jail for that scam and that ended my relationship with her.

I haven’t worked to find an agent since then. That said, I know that having a good agent can be helpful and can really help on the business side of publishing. So I’ve been giving serious thought to beginning the search again.

Steampunk wouldn’t be steampunk without the science. During your ‘daily’ life, you operate telescopes at Kitt Peak National Observatory. When you aren’t tinkering, you enjoy history and travel. What triggered the jump from doing things like this in the real world to putting them on paper as stories?

In some ways the jump actually happened the other way around. I’ve been writing stories as long as I can remember. Sometime when I was about eight years old, I declared to my parents that I was going to be a writer. They told me I couldn’t do that, no one ever made money as a writer. So they encouraged me to find something I could make money at. Because I liked space exploration from all the science fiction I read as a kid, I thought astronomy would be a good career, and it succeeded in pleasing my parents.

Now I should step back and say, no one can have a good career in science if they don’t have a passion for the subject. That passion for me developed starting when I was eight and has continued to grow since then. The work we do at Kitt Peak nowadays, looking for exoplanets and trying to understand dark matter and dark energy is vitally important and I’m really honored to be a part of it.

That said, writing is like having a good diet for me. I just don’t feel right if I go a week without putting some words into the computer!

You are one of the many who merge writer and editor in one entity. Did you start as an editor or did you start as a writer? What made you pursue both aspects of writing?

My science career is actually where I got my start in editing. My science papers were heavily hacked up and put back together again by peers. It gave me a strong appreciation for clarity in writing. As I started seriously pursuing writing for publication and being part of writer’s groups, I realized I could bring those skills to my fellow writers.

A short time after that, my wife pursued her MBA at the University of Arizona. She did research into small press publishing and we decided to start a small press called Hadrosaur Productions where I could use those editorial skills I’d been acquiring. The press was originally going to focus on audio books, but it really got off the ground with a small magazine called HADROSAUR TALES. Over the years, we’ve changed the format and its now called TALES OF THE TALISMAN.

Can you tell us a little about your editing work?

Most of the editing I do now is selecting and editing stories for TALES OF THE TALISMAN magazine. We have two reading periods each year starting on January 1 and July 1. We read until the magazine is full — usually about six weeks after opening. People can learn more about the magazine, order a sample copy and get writer’s guidelines at talesofthetalisman.com

Editing a magazine for 17 years has given me a really critical eye for stories. I have a good sense for what things work and don’t work in a story. I’ve learned that if you mention something in a story, you should pay it off in some way before the story ends. I’ve also developed a pretty good eye for things that have been done to death, versus ideas that could use further exploration. I use all of that both when selecting stories for the magazine as well as when writing my own stories and novels.

As I mentioned earlier, I’ve also edited two anthologies for Flying Pen Press called SPACE PIRATES and SPACE HORRORS. Those were invitation anthologies, where I invited a set of writers I knew and had worked with to submit. I picked the writers because I knew they were solid storytellers and would bring a good balance to the anthologies.

Every writer approaches a book differently. Do you have a set method for writing a novel? If so, do you mind sharing your process? What makes you tick as a writer?

I usually start a novel with a handful of cool ideas — or at least ideas I think are cool. I start a file on the computer and put those ideas down, then let them percolate for a while until I understand the story that links those ideas together. At that point, I typically put together a synopsis that gives me an idea of what the novel is actually about. That’s about the time I’m ready to start composing the novel.

At that point, I approach chapters the same way I approach short stories. In both cases, I start thinking about the events and go through a process of visualization. I try to “see” the events of the story as though they are something that actually happened. Once I think I have the story sorted out, I’m finally ready to sit down and write it. By the time I get to that stage, I feel like I’m writing about something that actually happened. I take a lot of long walks and a lot of this visualizing happens while I’m out walking.

Do you ever find that your editorial side interferes with your creative side?

Not too much. I do find that I tend to edit as I type, trying to make things get better even as I’m writing them. However, that’s where the long walks come in. I get the basics of the story down in my mind before I actually try to set them down in the computer. It becomes a way for me to keep the editor in me from interfering with story creation before I’m ready to write the words. Once I’m ready to write the words, the editor helps to make sure I get the right ones down the first time — or at least close to the right ones!

Writing is a never-ending process. Do you have any new projects that are in the works right now? Can you tell us a little about what you’re actively working on?

Right now I’m putting the finishing touches on a novel called DRAGON’S FALL. It’s a prequel to VAMPIRES OF THE SCARLET ORDER that’s slated to be out in early 2012. The book is basically complete and edited, but I’m working on some extra scenes my editor and I thought would enhance the novel.

Next after that, I plan to start work on a sequel to OWL DANCE tentatively entitled CLOCKWORK POSSE. I’ve already started collecting ideas and throwing them into a file on my computer!

What is your favorite part of writing?

I think my favorite part is when I realize that I have a story that actually works. That usually happens somewhere between the visualization step and the actual writing stage. Basically it’s the moment in writing where I realize that I know this story and I don’t have to work at it. I’m just along for an enjoyable ride!

If you could give a new writer one piece of advice, what would it be?

Always hone and practice your craft. Part of that is to read with a thoughtful eye — see what other writers do better than you and see if you can incorporate something of that into your own writing. Part of that is to write regularly and look at your own writing with a critical eye. Ask yourself if you told a story in the best possible way. Have readers give you feedback and pay attention. Readers and editors aren’t always right, but they always provide insight.

No interview is complete without a strange question. You can take one famous author to lunch with you. During the hour you have with them, you are not allowed to talk about the writing craft or about books in any shape or form. Who would you take with you and what would you talk about?

I think it would have to be Neil Gaiman and I would talk to him about the places he’s been. It sounds like he’s traveled quite a bit around the United States and so have I. It would be fun to talk about some of the things we’ve seen and people we’ve encountered. Of course, maybe that’s cheating since that’s the essence of what good storytelling is all about!

Thank you for joining us!

Thanks for the interview! It was a pleasure. Please feel free to let me know if you have any followup questions.

 

Originally posted on November 30, 2011.

Today is the last day of National Novel Writing Month. For some, this calls for a glass of Champagne and chocolates. For others, it signifies the end of a rough, long journey. NaNo was a challenge for me this year. I hit the basic 50,000 word goal, but I fell short of my real goal for the month. It is bitter, it is sweet, but I walked away with a lot of pleasant memories and the foundations of a book.

I managed to acquire an interview with Kimberly AKA @kimberlyFDR. This is her first year at trying Nano.

To the interview!

~

Greetings, Kimberly! Welcome to December the end of November. This is your first year doing National Novel Writing Month – Congrats on joining the hundreds of thousands who are just as insane
as you are. How did you find your first experience with NaNo?

It was exciting! I had previously (March to May 2011) completed an urban fantasy novel’s first draft and found that my normal writing speed was 1500 words per hour, but then I’d give myself the next day to add 500 extra words and edit the section as well. I can’t let things go unedited. The prospect of doing NaNo, which was a higher wordcount per day AND the challenge of not editing was daunting. When I originally went in, I was planning on being a rebel and actually just using the structure to write a 30,000 word novella. This novel had other ideas. I found myself pushing to hit the wordcount on the graph and even exceeding it. I found the fun competition between my writing buddies pushing me to see if I could pass them each day. And to get around my need to edit, I even made allowances. I’d hit or exceed the wordcount each night and then allow myself some editing time the next morning to clean it up. It worked for me and it proved that I can do this! I can do NaNoWriMo!

From what I understand, you started writing long before you decided to participate in
NaNoWriMo. Tell us a little bit about when you started writing and the things you
normally write about.

I’ve been writing my entire life, starting very young with short stories, plays, poems, etc. I got a Creative Writing minor at UNC and I’ve done short story publications throughout my life. I’m currently a media reviewer in my off-hours for three blogs, so I write about one to three articles a week for them. I did one (failed) novel when I was younger and then I wrote my first full-length urban fantasy earlier this year. This will be my second novel of 2011. I was happy to do shot fiction prior, but I like the expanded abilities of storytelling that novels provide now. I usually write urban fantasy, though I have dabbled in Southern fiction when I was younger since my writing career was shaped by Reynolds Price.

Like me, you were adventurous in what you wrote for NaNoWriMo this year. Now,
granted, I wasn’t quite as adventurous, but that is ok! At the risk of some blushing from
anyone reading this interview, tell us a little about what you wrote about this year.

For NaNo, I did a genderswap story that isn’t quite erotica, but it’s bordering on the elements in some sections. I’ll copy my novel blurb from the NaNo site–Alex, a womanizer, has sex with the wrong woman and she curses him, wishing he “knew what it was like for a woman.” Thus begins his genderswap journey as he slowly gains secondary female characteristics. With the help of his female best friend, Alex tries to deal with who he is becoming, while failing to find the woman who set him down this path. Along the way, he and his best friend are becoming closer and their friendship may become something more before Alex’s journey is over. (It’s become more a focus on transgender elements, feeling like you don’t fit within your own body and having an identity that doesn’t match the exterior.)

What inspired you to take the plunge and write this sort of story?

I read gender fiction (genderswap fiction and fiction that focuses on re-evaluation of societal gender roles), but I never considered writing it myself, certainly not towards a novel-length story, but that’s what NaNo provided for me and that’s what I did. I’m sorta embarrassed by it….but it passed 50,000 and the first draft will pass 65,000 before it’s over, so I guess it’s a story I needed to write for some reason. If nothing else, it’s help me become more comfortable with writing sexual scenes when usually I just fade to black. Perhaps that’s why I wrote it, to challenge myself to delve into areas I hadn’t before and see if I could do it.

What was the hardest part of NaNoWriMo for you?

Going in, the prospect of not editing frightened me, but I find that the rules apply only in terms of “don’t edit and ruin the wordcount goal for the day.” As long as you make the wordcount, or exceed it, editing isn’t the horrible thing that it’s made out to be. Get your wordcount first. Whatever else you do after that is up to you.

What did you like the most about NaNoWriMo?

The friendly competition, either between Writing Buddies or just a challenge against yourself. Being able to see where everyone else was in the process, as well as seeing the graph of where you were versus where you were expected to be each day made me exceed further than I imagined. It gave me extra motivation in order to get ahead on my wordcount.

What did you dislike about NaNoWriMo?

The discrepancy between NaNoWriMo’s official wordcount verification and my Open Office document. Last night, in order to get NaNoWriMo to verify that I had passed the 50,000 mark, I had to actually write an extra 1400 words. Open Office says my novel so far is 51,414 words and NaNo’s site verification says 50,122. I had heard about the inflation prior, which is why I tried to get an extra day’s cushion in for my wordcount, but had I not known that I would have been below the verification level when the 30th rolled around.

Is NaNoWriMo something that you would recommend to other writers? Why or why not?

I’d definitely recommend it because you never know what you can do until you try. Sure, 50,000 words in a month might be a goal that’s far beyond your reach when you first dive in, but give it a try. Even if you don’t meet the finish line in November, you can keep going a your own pace and meet the goal in December. Plus, the motivation and support that NaNoWriMo’s community provides pushes you forward and makes you want to succeed. All these people are writing alongside you. It’s encouraging!

Now that you’re on the other end of the month and NaNoWriMo has come to an end, do you have plans on doing anything with the story you’ve written?

Well, I have to finish it ;) My outline still has 8 more points on it (around 14,000 words) before the first draft is done. Even then, it’s just a first draft and will expand more once I go back in and fill out the scenes I summarized earlier in an attempt to just move forward. Once it’s been through multiple revisions and critique sessions, I have a list of a few agents and publishers I want to send it to. It’s quite unlike the strict genres that are outlined within the publishing marketplace, but I know there’s a readership for the story elements I wrote about, so I hope to find it a home somewhere.

We hear it over and over during November; Quantity trumps Quality. How did this
mentality make you feel while you were writing day after day? Was it something that
might have negatively impacted your general writing abilities, or was it a pleasant break
from the norm? How do you think this mentality might harm new writers?

I don’t exactly agree with the mentality. Yes, getting 1000 words down on the page is 1000 words you didn’t have, and even if you have to trash all of them, it allowed you to get past the block you might have had to get to the next plot point. However, I think you should try to write a story that has you intrigued enough that you want to see it shine. That way, you will be trying to write it at a higher quality than if you’re just shooting for an arbitrary wordcount and will put you in a better position when you go back to edit for the second draft.

If you could pick one moment from the month of November to be a cherished memory,
what would that moment be?

Honestly, I’d say when I got the verification that I had actually done what I set out to do. The fact that I surprised myself enough to exceed my former daily writing goals, that I had a story to tell and was able to tell it, and the fact that I was pushing ahead towards the finish line were all great motivators, but getting that verified “you did it!” was the greatest feeling. I love that my story isn’t over yet and that I can continue to work on it to get a first draft that I can edit over multiple revisions. NaNoWriMo is done, but I’m not.

No interview is complete without an odd question from the peanut gallery. You are stuck on a cruise with one of these two people: Sean Connery or Harrison Ford. You will take turns reading books to each other for an entire week. Which person would you pick for this and why? (Also, give us a list of a few books you’d want to read to your gentleman of choice.)

For strictly reading to each other, Sean Connery. He’s got a great voice :) Can I take Harrison along for commentary and other chats? As for a few books I’d want to read to one or the other of the lovely gentlemen, most aren’t within the genre they’d appreciate, but perhaps a few:

1. The Promise of Rest by Reynolds Price (actually, all my Reynolds Price books)
2. Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides (because that should last us until we’re back at the dock and more!)
3. Mariette in Ecstasy by Ron Hansen (I still love that book, ever since college)
4. A few Elliott Roosevelt mysteries (because they’re good, fast reads with FDR!)
5. Salem’s Lot by Stephen King (a guilty pleasure)
6. And the entire Tales of the City collection by Armistead Maupin (my copies are well-worn, but they’ll travel well;)

Thanks for the questions!

 

Originally posted on September 15, 2011.

A few things of note. This story was originally a contest entry, and I wrote it a short period of time, with little to no editing. It was done entirely for fun, and I hope that it is enjoyed for its humor.

~

Macaroni and cheese doesn’t grow feet and walk away. It doesn’t grow on trees, either, but I digress. If it did grow on trees, more people would spend their time outside. Not that I would be one of them. I liked macaroni and cheese, but not enough to brave the crime-polluted streets of Detroit to get it.

The macaroni and cheese in question had once been in my fridge. It even had ‘Amanda’ written in my neat handwriting right on the top of the plastic lid of the baking dish. The dish was still there. So was the lid. But no macaroni and cheese.

Jason wouldn’t have done it. He didn’t even like cheese. He turned funny shades of green just from the smell of it. I couldn’t help but grin. It had been fun, watching him squirm when I had been baking it yesterday. So that was one roommate down.

Two to go.

Sylvie? I laughed at that thought. As the winner of the Little Miss Twig pageant, macaroni and cheese was about as offensive as a monkey flinging poo into her face. Cheese? Noodles? Hello, fat! Hell no. Not Sylvie, then.

I pressed my lips together in a thin line and stomped down the hall to Michael’s room. Yes, it had to be him. Only Michael would raid an entire week’s worth of dinner out of the fridge and scarf it down in a single sitting.

“Michael!” I kicked open his door. He lay sprawled in bed, his giggling, naked girlfriend snuggling against him. I blinked. Blinked again. Heat washed over my cheeks until it felt like my face was about to spontaneously combust.

Oh hell no. I did not just see Michael, the computer nerd, software developing, World of Warcraft playing Michael having sex. Impossible. He was like every other geek I’d ever seen; dark, tousled hair, pimply and equipped with a pocket protector. There had to be some Law of the Universe that specifically stated that a situation like this was completely and totally impossible.

I slammed the door. If my macaroni and cheese was somehow involved in what was going on in that room, I would die. On the spot.

I would just say it wasn’t Michael’s fault. I could cope with that. I couldn’t cope with – well, forget that. Just forget it. Please.

Back to Jason. At least I learn from my mistakes. I tapped the door and waited for his grunt of acknowledgement before kicking it open. There was a bed involved again, but this time the occupant was fully clothed. And without a partner. Unless you called his guitar – hey, wait.

Was that my macaroni and cheese?

I stared at the floor. There was a pentagram drawn in sharpie on the hardwood floor. In the center were my noodles. Upside down. The bottom of a homemade dish of macaroni and cheese, I had to admit, looked like something a zombie would enjoy.

If the zombie was a lacto-ovo vegetarian with a brain complex.

“Stand back! I will purge the world of this evil dish. I will save you!” Jason jumped to his feet and pointed at me. He bounced on his springy bed. It rocked beneath him, creaking as it sometimes did in the middle of the night. Seriously? What I thought was my wall mate having sex was him jumping on the bed? Seriously? What twenty-odd year olds still jumped on the bed?

Ones that dumped macaroni and cheese on the floor and pretended to exorcise it, apparently.

“You better save yourself,” I growled as I rolled up my long sleeves.

“Amanda!” Slyvie’s high-pitched voice spared Jason an immediate beating, but it didn’t stop me from whirling around to glare at the size-0, prettier than life model. Little Miss Twig stared with an open mouth, a bouquet of roses clutched in one hand. “Ah, er. . . these are for you? Don’tknowwhosenthemhavefunbye.”

The roses were thrust into my arms over the macaroni and cheese sacrifice. She fled as though chased by demons. The bed creaked. Jason’s bare feet slapped against the floor. I felt his breath on my neck before he kissed my cheek.

“Happy birthday!”

 

Originally posted on August 11, 2011.

Book #1: On Writing Well  by William Knowlton Zinsser

This is the book that got me interested in writing well. I strongly recommend it if you don’t have it. It covers a lot of important aspects of writing. While it does target Non-Fiction, the lessons that are within can be applied to fiction writing too.

I partnered this book with Elements of Style. I found On Writing Well actually explained things, where Elements of Style fell short for me. This was not the fault of the Elements of Style. It is entirely my fault. Why do I say this? Elements of Style is a more advanced book. If you aren’t strong with grammar, Elements of Style will likely overwhelm and frustrate.

Here is what you can expect with On Writing Well. I found this to be a no-nonsense, serious book about writing. But, there is a sense of humor about the book, which is part of why I loved reading it. This was the first writing-centric book that got — and held — my attention the entire way through. I read it in one sitting.

I first encountered this book as a part of an English course in college. At this point, I didn’t really know that my grammar was, frankly, horrible. This book illuminated this fact for me and started the process of me trying to understand more on how the English language worked. I’m still not perfect at this, and I am still learning, but this was a critical starting point for me.

Perhaps there are other books out there that do the job better, but this one will always stand out to me as a pivotal reference.

I give this book an A++.

Book #2: The Elements of Style by Strunk & White

I am not a huge fan of this book. I use it, but it is not the pivotal book for me that many other writers view it as. However, I still think that it has a very important place in my writing career — not for how it succeeded for me, but rather in how it made me realize how little I actually knew about the English language.

My experiences with the Elements of Style boiled down to not understanding half of what the book was talking about. I ended up realizing that I really knew nothing of grammar, what the terms mentioned meant, and having to relearn the English language from scratch. On Writing Well (that book again!) was able to help me understand some of what Strunk & White show in Elements. I still haven’t been able to conquer my initial bad experience with the Elements of Style, but if you’re comfortable with your English grammar and technicalities, then this little reference book is likely worth its weight in gold to you.

I own a copy, and likely will always keep a copy in my reference library.

Book #3: Grammatically CORRECT by Anne Stilman

This is another volume that has seen better days in my collection. When I first got it, I had it out so often that it was the victim to spilled drinks and the kin. I love this book. It explains things on a technical level in such a way where it makes sense. For a writer, knowing the rules of language is important. Knowing just how you can get away with breaking those rules is even -more- vital. This book explains things from punctuation, spelling style, grammar — you name it, it is likely in this book.

It is about an inch thick, and took me several days to really digest and read, but it stays close to my computer when I am writing. If I have a grammar question, it is usually the first reference I pick up.

Book #4: A Grammar Book for You and I … oops, me! by C. Edward Good

The humor of this book makes this, like Grammatically CORRECT, a huge favorite with me. This book focuses on explaining things as if you don’t actually know what you’re doing when it comes to the English Language. Who would have thought?! This book is a heavy read, but so worth it. The humor is spot on, it takes itself just seriously enough to get the point across, and focuses on grammar rules that help people with day to day life.

One thing I appreciate about this book is how simplistic the approach is. He doesn’t use a lot of outside references, but the list he does have is rather interesting. He references: The Garner Oxford (The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style), Garner Legal (A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage), Follett’s Modern American Usage, Fowler’s A Dictionary of Modern English Usageand The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, Kane’s Oxford Guide to Writing, Strunk & White’s Elements of Style, and Random House’s The Random House Dictionary of the English Language. (If you want links to these references, I will edit them in upon request.)

~*

These four books are the impact books for me. There are a few references that I am looking at acquiring. I will let you know how they perform compared to these ‘big’ four. I have used many other reference books, but these are the ones I have dished out money for, and would dish out for again.

© 2012 On Writing Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha